Iris' Residence on the Net > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Ahhhhh, Youtube. That amazing place on the net, crammed with hundreds and hundreds and tens of millions and EcoLight LED tens of millions of videos. That lovely dumpster of tutorials and helpful info mixed with unusual movie summaries narrated with TTS, AI generated kids videos, compilations of individuals hurting themselves, and so so so so so so many response movies. Internet was once textual content. Hyperlinked textual content. Fan-made pages about the most random stuff. We used to be webmasters, do you remember? This isn't just another journey down nolstalgia lane. There’s a motive I’m serious about Youtube proper now: We actually have the same stuff in there that we used to have on textual content. And I’m fearful of that. And don’t get me flawed. Movies could be something wonderful. Movies require much more data and resources to file and edit. Videos exaggerate biases. We merely don’t pay attention the identical solution to someone uglier or dirtier. Videos are less accesible.

Movies waste large amounts of bandwidth and storage. Videos have become unnecessarily long, and crammed with ads. Videos usually are not searchable or simply archivable. Videos are, at present, virtually exclusively hosted on closed social media, like Youtube or TikTok. It’s a very nice and entertaining video, and you’ll probably study one thing from it. I’m going to copy here the transcript of a Youtube video. I want to extract a abstract of this video, written as an everyday weblog submit. In the quest for vitality-environment friendly lighting options, manufacturers have often had to deal with challenges related to traditional technologies. One intriguing example of innovation comes from General Electric (GE), which introduced a unique hybrid light bulb combining both compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) and incandescent technologies. The bulb, marketed as "bright from the start," aimed to handle the gradual warm-up time of conventional CFLs by incorporating an incandescent bulb throughout the CFL construction. This hybrid design allowed for speedy brightness, overcoming a big drawback of early CFL know-how.

Earlier than the widespread adoption of energy-saving LED bulbs bulbs, CFLs were hailed for their power efficiency but criticized for his or her sluggish start-up occasions and unattractive look, notably in decorative fixtures. Engineers experimented with various strategies to conceal or modify the looks of CFLs, together with integrating them into different bulb shapes and utilizing reflectors to imitate directional lighting. Nonetheless, enclosing CFL tubes in decorative fixtures posed challenges, as the sealed surroundings prompted the tubes to run hotter, affecting their performance. Manufacturers devised solutions akin to using mercury amalgams to regulate vapor stress and incorporating temperature compensation mechanisms. GE’s hybrid gentle bulb exemplifies one such solution, seamlessly mixing the moment brightness of incandescent bulbs with the efficiency of CFLs. The bulb incorporates a halogen capsule alongside the CFL tube, offering fast illumination upon startup, earlier than transitioning to full CFL brightness once warmed up. Whereas GE’s hybrid bulb successfully addressed the slow startup problem, it additionally highlighted some limitations. For instance, in chilly climates, the bulb’s efficiency might be compromised because of the temperature-delicate halogen capsule.

Regardless of its drawbacks, the hybrid bulb represented an progressive approach to bridging the gap between conventional and energy-environment friendly lighting applied sciences. Nevertheless, with the arrival of inexpensive LED bulbs, the need for such hybrid solutions has diminished. The evolution of lighting technologies showcases the continuing quest for enchancment, often by way of revolutionary combinations of previous and new technologies. Whereas options like GE’s hybrid bulb may have been short-term fixes, they reveal the creative problem-fixing spirit driving developments in power-environment friendly lighting. It’s not perfect. And it’s absolutely not as entertaining as watching him speak. But in the event you wished to "learn" a bit, it’s as environment friendly as it will get. The original video is 27 minutes long, and in response to the transcript, 4518 words are spoken. With a mean reading speed of 220 wpm, energy-saving LED bulbs in that point 5940 phrases could possibly be learn. That 31% more. And you would skip strains or EcoLight leap between paragraphs easily, further increasing your velocity. My biggest concern with video is that this: entertainment and data are fully fused collectively.