http bs2best at > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

When asked Tuesday whether he believed it was never acceptable to assault a police officer, Trump replied, "Sure." Pressed on a specific case of an individual who drove a stun gun into the neck of a police officer but who received a pardon, Trump said he didn’t know but would "take a look at everything."

Asked once more whether the pardons were sending a message that assaulting officers is OK, Trump said, "No, the opposite."

"I’https m bs2site at the friend of police more than any president that’s ever been in this office," he said.

Shortly before taking office, Vice President JD Vance said those who committed violence that day "obviously" shouldn’t be pardoned.

Asked Tuesday why Vance’s assertion was wrong, Trump said, "Well, only for one reason: They’ve served years in jail. They should not have served — excuse me — and they’ve served years in jail. … These were people that actually love our country, so we thought a pardon would be appropriate."

Most Republicans wouldn’t weigh in on whether Trump had made the right decision. Sen. John Cornyn, a Republican from Texas, argued it was the president’s prerogative, not Congress’, to issue pardons, a sentiment echoed by several others, including House