Winning Tactics For What Is Sport > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

In 1954 he began freelancing for Sports Illustrated, illustrating the golf column "Tips from the highest," and later articles by Herbert Warren Wind and on Hogans’ secret grip in 1955. These lead to major articles on the secrets and techniques of professional baseball, the mastery of small boat crusing, the techniques of fly-fishing, and the secrets of bowling. "Mastery of Small Boat Sailing: Part 1." SI 23 Feb 1959. (Bill Cox Winner: Sears Cup, Mallory Cup, Prince of Wales Bowl. "Big League Secrets: Part 3. Del Crandell on the Art of Catching." Sports Illustrated 21 Apr 1958. (Del Crandell lifetime: .254, 179 HR, 657 RBI, 9 time All-star). "Big League Secrets: Part 1. Sal Maglie on the Art of Pitching." SI 17 Mar 1958. (Sal Maglie lifetime 119-62, 3.15 Era, 2 time All-star). Sports are half of every tradition past and current, however each tradition has its personal definition of sports activities. In 1957 Hogan approached Ravielli for instance a 5 part series titled the "The Five Lessons: The fashionable Fundamentals of Golf." The outcome, which was shortly turned into a guide, would develop into, maybe, a very powerful e-book on golf instruction ever written. 6. Ben Hogan. "The Modern Fundamentals of Golf." SI 11 Mar 1957; or Hogan, Ben.

New York. A.S. Barnes, 1957. (Ben Hogan lifetime: 64 PGA wins, 9 majors, four time participant of the Year, 5 time money chief). 1957. (Don Carter: 7 PBA titles, 6 time PBA bowler of the yr, Bowling Magazine Bowler of the Century). 3. Don Carter. 10 Secrets of Bowling. Make things fairly, and unpredictable (as Chris says), but maintain the essential architecture and individual site logic your customers have taken the time to be taught. But I think the lull in users would possibly even have one thing to do with news sites' design. I believe that customers of news sites are on particular person missions to get the news, and something that freaks 'em out or confuses them (i.e., anything dramatically completely different than what they're used to seeing) will throw them for a loop. Such as you, I believe he's often too strict about his ideas. It looks as if this is the eternal wrestle between design and growth that's occurring on the web, proper?

I'd add a 3rd social gathering to your "design vs. development" wrestle: conventional journalists. This is likely to be an entire different animal, however it positively affects design and improvement. Anyway, this begs for communication between design and growth -- something I have been trying to persuade newspapers to do (by way of the considerably questionable methodology of begging them to hire me for that very purpose). My changing issues around I additionally ought to have talked about consistency -- I would like the altering round newspapers do with their entrance pages. To answer your other query, I've all the time had this obsessive-compulsive have to have complete information -- not just factoids, but the whole story. I believe the reply is someplace in the middle, although barely nearer the "templates" facet of the argument. So I think sites can change things around to a level. I believe a few of what he says is very limiting, though I agree he generally has good concepts. It's extra of a holistic viewpoint for Web stuff, although there's a degree where all-encompassing ideas like that just turn into plain silliness. Chris, can you level out any examples of reports websites that do this, if any? His spare, elegant, and remarkably accurate illustrations still stand right this moment as a few of the perfect examples of the medium.

Despite 50 years of changes to the game it is still in print, and nonetheless a bestseller. Raviellis’ profession would span greater than forty years. Specifically, 25 % of Americans get information on-line at the least thrice per week, as compared to 23 p.c two years ago. When i noticed that the new York Times was doing the 'electronic edition' crap, I felt like they have been saying that the strictly Web edition was inferior to the print product. The new York Times seems related every week - similar fonts, similar column grid, identical rules, and many others. Yet, day-after-day the entrance web page is totally different - the tales, their order, placement and size on the page differ from day to day, along with the headlines, their measurement, and their placement, (similar with photographs, and so on.). There are many websites that change their headlines, and possibly a photograph, all through the day - never varying the scale of any of the headlines, not deviating from the template whatsoever. Imagine if daily you walked previous your favourite newspaper's bin, there was the same design, simply new phrases - similar placement, same font measurement, similar size photograph in the same place, every thing's the same. Either you are probably the most automated site round and just plug your headlines and photos into the identical design every single day, or you toil to create a brand new facade for the site each morning.