Consent as the Cornerstone of Safe Performer Collaboration > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

In any interaction between performers, in a studio, consent is not just a formality—it is the core of trust, safety, full blog post here and respect. Consent checks are dynamic check-ins that ensure all participants feels physically and mentally at ease with their personal space and limits.

These checks are not a blanket permission; they must be repeated before each new scene, especially when the context changes.

Performers often work in demanding sensory settings, where physical staging, emotional close-ups, contact work can cross personal lines if not clearly mapped out. A consent check gives each person the authority to say affirmative, uncertain, or declining without fear of judgment or pressure. It also enables fluid boundary adjustments, recognizing that physical tolerance fluctuates over time.

It is not enough to assume that because someone nodded in rehearsal they have ongoing authorization. Consent is not a contract—it is a continually renewed pact that must be reaffirmed daily.

This practice safeguards mental well-being, reduces the risk of trauma, and elevates human worth above production demands.

Professionals across the industry are increasingly adopting consent-driven production guidelines, often supported by intimacy coordinators trained in trauma-informed collaboration. These roles help encourage proactive check-ins and achieve consensus before contact.

The responsibility does not fall on one person alone. Each team participant—from stage managers and fight directors—must engage consistently in maintaining a respect-centered workplace. Asking, "Is this okay?" should be as standard as rehearsing lines.

When consent is treated as an core component of performance, not an add-on, performers can give their best work with confidence. It transforms the workplace into one where care comes first, and where innovation emerges because people feel psychologically secure.

Consent checks are not about adding bureaucracy—they are about cultivating ethical artistic practices.