Smart Tracking: Simultaneous Anatomical Imaging and Real-time Passive Device Tracking For MR-guided Interventions > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Purpose: This study demonstrates a proof of idea of a way for simultaneous anatomical imaging and real-time (Smart) passive machine monitoring for MR-guided interventions. Methods: Phase Correlation template matching was mixed with a fast undersampled radial multi-echo acquisition using the white marker phenomenon after the primary echo. In this fashion, the first echo offers anatomical distinction, whereas the opposite echoes present white marker distinction to permit accurate gadget localization utilizing quick simulations and template matching. This method was examined on tracking of 5 0.5 mm steel markers in an agarose phantom and on insertion of an MRI-compatible 20 Gauge titanium needle in ex vivo porcine tissue. The areas of the steel markers were quantitatively compared to the marker locations as discovered on a CT scan of the identical phantom. Results: The average pairwise error between the MRI and CT areas was 0.30 mm for monitoring of stationary steel spheres and 0.29 mm throughout motion.

Qualitative evaluation of the monitoring of needle insertions confirmed that tracked positions have been stable throughout needle insertion and retraction. Conclusions: The proposed iTagPro smart tracker monitoring method offered correct passive monitoring of units at high framerates, inclusion of real-time anatomical scanning, and the potential of computerized slice positioning. Furthermore, the strategy doesn't require specialized hardware and will subsequently be applied to trace any inflexible steel machine that causes appreciable magnetic area distortions. An necessary problem for iTagPro smart tracker MR-guided interventions is fast and accurate localization of interventional gadgets. Most interventional units used in MRI, resembling metal needles and iTagPro smart device paramagnetic markers, iTagPro smart tracker don't generate distinction at the precise location of the units. Instead, the presence of those units causes artifacts in MR photographs because of magnetic susceptibility differences. In passive monitoring, the device is localized based mostly on its passive effect on the MR signal. The accuracy and framerate achieved by passive monitoring are principally restricted by the power of the passive impact of the device, i.e. bigger devices and gadgets with strong magnetic susceptibilities will be easier to trace.

Within the case of active tracking, these coils are hooked up to a obtain channel on the scanner. The largest disadvantage of (semi-)active monitoring is that specialized hardware is required, which is dear to develop and provides to the scale of the devices. We consider that in a really perfect situation an MR-based mostly device tracking technique should share the advantages of both passive and active tracking, whereas minimizing the disadvantages. First, which means the method should be accurate, robust, ItagPro and will have real-time updates for iTagPro smart tracker device monitoring (i.e. a number of updates per second). Second, the system should permit actual visualization of the gadget on an anatomical reference picture, of which the slice position should mechanically replace. Ideally, iTagPro smart tracker this picture can be acquired simultaneously to make sure that patient movement and iTagPro geofencing deformation of anatomical constructions does not affect the accuracy of the visualization. Finally, the hardware utilized in the method ought to be protected, low-cost to implement, and versatile with regard to clinical applications. On this examine, iTagPro geofencing we developed a passive monitoring methodology which goals to fulfill these criteria.

We propose Smart monitoring: SiMultaneous Anatomical imaging and Real-Time tracking. An undersampled 2D radial multi-echo pulse sequence was used to attain high replace rates and iTagPro smart tracker to accumulate anatomical distinction simultaneously with the device tracking. The proposed methodology requires no specialised hardware and iTagPro device can be applied to any metal device that induces adequate magnetic subject adjustments to regionally cause dephasing. We display a proof of concept of the method on monitoring of 0.5 mm steel markers in an agarose phantom and on insertion of an MRI-suitable 20 Gauge titanium needle in ex vivo porcine tissue. The primary innovations of this examine with respect to beforehand printed studies on metal system localization are the following: 1) Acceleration to real-time framerates through radial undersampling; 2) generalization of the Phase Correlation template matching and simulation methods to acquisitions that use non-Cartesian sampling, undersampling, and/or acquire multiple echoes; and 3) mixture of anatomical distinction with optimistic distinction mechanisms to provide intrinsically registered anatomical reference for device localization.